Articles Posted in Massachusetts Medical Malpractice

Published on:

According to USA Today roughly 19 million visitors pass through Boston each year.  It is no surprise given all that Boston has to offer.  With such a huge number of visitors, it is no wonder that many are injured.  Many visitors are injured in car accidents, slip and falls, and other types of accident cases.  Visitors are sometimes more prone to accidents given their lack of familiarity with Boston.  However, the fact that you do not live in Massachusetts does not mean you cannot hire a Massachusetts lawyer to represent you.

My office has represented out-of-state clients injured in car accidents, hotels, stores, trains, on escalators, etc.  If you or someone you know has been injured while a visitor in Boston, feel free to call my office.  We would be happy to provide a no-obligation phone consultation.  

Published on:

Those who have been injured by the negligence of someone else often lose time from work, rack up medical bills, and suffer a host of other problems.  Getting a damaged car fixed, going to medical appointments, dealing with insurance companies, all take time and aggravation.  That is the bad news.  The good news is that nearly every personal injury lawyer in America works on contingency. 

First, contingency agreements allows everyone, no matter where they stand financially, access to a personal injury lawyer.  This means you get to have equal footing with an insurance company, without having to pay an hourly legal rate.  In fact, you pay nothing unless your personal injury attorney is successful in securing compensation for you.

Secondly, the contingency agreement also deters the filing of frivolous lawsuits.  It would make little sense for an attorney to take on a bad case that has no shot of settling or winning at trial.  Frivolous lawsuits and the contingency agreement are like oil and water.  Lawyers, like everyone else, don't like to work for free.  Taking on a frivolous case is the same thing as working for free.  It makes no sense.

Published on:

Here is an informative article I found over at insure.com on when, and when not to, hire a personal injury lawyer.  The article does a good job of dealing with this issue that concerns injury victims each and every day.  If someone carelessly injured you and you are unsure whether or not to get a lawyer, at least consult with a lawyer (nearly every personal injury lawyer offers free initial consultations) before you handle any legal process on your own.  Here is the article:

When to hire a personal injury lawyer

By Insure.com

Published on:

The following article by the Wall Street Journal Health Blog offers some alarming information on just how much medical errors financially burden the United States economy.  Here is the article:

  

Medical errors and the problems they can cause — including bed sores, post-op infections and implant or device complications — cost the U.S. economy $19.5 billion in 2008, according to a  study released today. (That’s enough to buy almost 1.3 billion copies of The Checklist Manifesto, Atul Gawande’s bestseller on reducing such errors via the lowly checklist.)

Published on:

I found this article over at personalinjuryplace.com and I thought it would be helpful to anyone in Massachusetts, or beyond, who has been injured due to the negligence of medical personnel.  Here it is:

Thousands die or are hurt by medical negligence every year. The numbers can be scary, with some studies pointing out tens of thousands of deaths and even more injuries related to medical negligence. We’ve gone over medical negligence on this blog, what you can do, but to better help you with your medical negligence claim, here are 6 tips designed to help you get through the legal ramifications.

To Be Safe
First off, if a loved one has died as a result of medical negligence, you must consider yourself before going after those involved. You will get your day in court, they will pay, but you should not downplay your emotions. There are programs for people who’ve suffered through a loved one’s death.

Published on:

The aftermath of an auto accident, slip and fall, injury at work, or any other injury causing event can cause great stress to not only the injury victim, but also to his or her family.  In order to make the aftermath just a little easier for you, here are my tips to those who have an attorney and are going through the typically frustrating and lengthy personal injury claim process:

1)  Trust your attorney (if you can't trust your attorney, find a new one immediately);

2)  Be patient.  Rome was not built in a day, and neither is a strong personal injury claim.  Give your attorney the time he or she needs to work the case up to where it needs to be for an optimum settlement/jury verdict;

Published on:

This article from Healthcare Finance News provides more data to defeat the myths advanced by tort reform advocates.  What is sad is that many victims of medical errors never pursue their claims against the responsible parties.  Here is the article:

Analysis: Medical malpractice payments continue to fall

March 10, 2010 | Chelsey Ledue, Associate Editor
Published on:

Here is the story from Boston.com:

 A Suffolk County jury yesterday found that two doctors at Children’s Hospital Boston – one of them the hospital’s former physician in chief – had caused the death of a 3-year-old Pennsylvania boy and voted to award his parents $15 million in damages.

comments

The actual damage award will be less because of an agreement reached by the parties before the verdict. But legal specialists said the amount voted by the jury was unusually large for a medical malpractice case involving a death. Awards of that size are more common in cases in which a patient is severely injured as a result of malpractice and requires years of costly treatment, they said.

After deliberating four days, the Superior Court jury found that Dr. James Lock, until last year the physician in chief, and Dr. James A. DiNardo, an anesthesiologist, caused the death of Jason Fox, said the child’s father, Brian Fox, of suburban Philadelphia.

The boy died in December 2004, a year and a half after undergoing a procedure at the hospital for a birth defect.

Fox said he and his wife, Andrea, believe doctors lied about their actions when treating Jason.

“The only protection individuals have when you go up against powerful Harvard, top-ranked physicians is the jury system, and that worked,’’ said Fox in a phone interview.

Jason went into Children’s “a playful and active little boy,’’ he said. “When he came out of the hospital, he was flown by air ambulance to a neurological rehabilitation facility near where we lived.’’

But William J. Dailey Jr., the Boston lawyer for Lock and DiNardo and two other doctors who were found negligent but not responsible for the death, said he was stunned by the verdict.

He said Jason had undergone eight unsuccessful procedures before his parents took him to Children’s in a desperate effort to save his life.

“He had as severe an underlying congenital heart disease as you could have,’’ Dailey said. “If something could have been done in Boston, it would have been extraordinary.’’

In an e-mail to Children’s staff about the verdict, Dr. James Mandell, chief executive of the hospital, wrote: “We are surprised and disappointed in this finding. We are confident that our clinicians provided outstanding care to this very sick child.’’

Michelle Davis, a hospital spokeswoman, said that the doctors will not appeal and that Lock’s stepping down as physician in chief was unrelated to the case.

“There is no doubt that he is an extremely important leader and continues to be an extremely important leader at Children’s Hospital Boston,’’ she said. “We have no doubts about his ability or his leadership.’’

Jason was born in July 2001 with Tetralogy of Fallot, a complex but usually treatable birth defect that affects the flow of blood through the heart. In his case, the defect was particularly serious and prevented his blood from carrying enough oxygen to his organs and limbs.

During the first two years of his life, Jason underwent open heart surgery and had seven cardiac catheterizations at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia to try to widen the arteries that carry blood to his lungs.

comments

Doctors in Philadelphia referred Jason to Lock, who pioneered the use of catheterization to repair cardiac birth defects. Lock agreed to try to widen more of the boy’s pulmonary arteries.

Hours after the child’s second catheterization, on April 18, 2003, Jason suffered a seizure. A CAT scan showed that contrast dye, which is injected during the procedure so doctors can better see the patient’s anatomy, had leaked into his brain.

After his seizure, Jason was transferred to the cardiac ICU and was given two MRIs to gauge the extent of his brain damage.

During the first MRI, doctors discovered a tiny piece of metal lodged in the boy’s brain, probably from a medical instrument, although it is uncertain whether it broke off during a procedure at Children’s or a previous procedure at another hospital.

At one point during the MRI, his heart rate plummeted, and doctors had to resuscitate him.

When he left the hospital, he was unable to walk or speak.

Brian Fox said the jury awarded damages of $5 million for his son’s pain and suffering, $5 million for Jason’s parents’ loss of their child, and $5 million for Jason’s wrongful death.

Andrew C. Meyer Jr., a prominent Boston medical malpractice lawyer who represents plaintiffs, said the $15 million was unusually large, given that the alleged malpractice did not lead to years of costly ongoing medical care.

However, the Foxes will not receive $15 million. Dailey said the defendants in the case agreed during jury deliberations to guarantee plaintiffs a minimum amount of damages, regardless of the verdict, in exchange for a cap on possible damages. Dailey declined to specify what the cap was.

Brian Fox’s trial lawyer, James Fox, a cousin who practices in California, would not confirm that such an agreement was reached.

The Board of Registration in Medicine is still investigating Lock and one of the physicians who was found negligent, Dr. Peter Laussen, who directed the cardiac intensive care unit, a board spokesman said yesterday.

The board reopened the investigation last year after learning that the hospital may not have provided complete information about the treatment the doctors gave Jason.

Brian Fox said yesterday that the board initiated an investigation this summer into DiNardo’s actions, as well.

Published on:

Here is the story from Boston.com:

 A Suffolk County jury yesterday found that two doctors at Children’s Hospital Boston – one of them the hospital’s former physician in chief – had caused the death of a 3-year-old Pennsylvania boy and voted to award his parents $15 million in damages.

comments

The actual damage award will be less because of an agreement reached by the parties before the verdict. But legal specialists said the amount voted by the jury was unusually large for a medical malpractice case involving a death. Awards of that size are more common in cases in which a patient is severely injured as a result of malpractice and requires years of costly treatment, they said.

After deliberating four days, the Superior Court jury found that Dr. James Lock, until last year the physician in chief, and Dr. James A. DiNardo, an anesthesiologist, caused the death of Jason Fox, said the child’s father, Brian Fox, of suburban Philadelphia.

The boy died in December 2004, a year and a half after undergoing a procedure at the hospital for a birth defect.

Fox said he and his wife, Andrea, believe doctors lied about their actions when treating Jason.

“The only protection individuals have when you go up against powerful Harvard, top-ranked physicians is the jury system, and that worked,’’ said Fox in a phone interview.

Jason went into Children’s “a playful and active little boy,’’ he said. “When he came out of the hospital, he was flown by air ambulance to a neurological rehabilitation facility near where we lived.’’

But William J. Dailey Jr., the Boston lawyer for Lock and DiNardo and two other doctors who were found negligent but not responsible for the death, said he was stunned by the verdict.

He said Jason had undergone eight unsuccessful procedures before his parents took him to Children’s in a desperate effort to save his life.

“He had as severe an underlying congenital heart disease as you could have,’’ Dailey said. “If something could have been done in Boston, it would have been extraordinary.’’

In an e-mail to Children’s staff about the verdict, Dr. James Mandell, chief executive of the hospital, wrote: “We are surprised and disappointed in this finding. We are confident that our clinicians provided outstanding care to this very sick child.’’

Michelle Davis, a hospital spokeswoman, said that the doctors will not appeal and that Lock’s stepping down as physician in chief was unrelated to the case.

“There is no doubt that he is an extremely important leader and continues to be an extremely important leader at Children’s Hospital Boston,’’ she said. “We have no doubts about his ability or his leadership.’’

Jason was born in July 2001 with Tetralogy of Fallot, a complex but usually treatable birth defect that affects the flow of blood through the heart. In his case, the defect was particularly serious and prevented his blood from carrying enough oxygen to his organs and limbs.

During the first two years of his life, Jason underwent open heart surgery and had seven cardiac catheterizations at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia to try to widen the arteries that carry blood to his lungs.

comments

Doctors in Philadelphia referred Jason to Lock, who pioneered the use of catheterization to repair cardiac birth defects. Lock agreed to try to widen more of the boy’s pulmonary arteries.

Hours after the child’s second catheterization, on April 18, 2003, Jason suffered a seizure. A CAT scan showed that contrast dye, which is injected during the procedure so doctors can better see the patient’s anatomy, had leaked into his brain.

After his seizure, Jason was transferred to the cardiac ICU and was given two MRIs to gauge the extent of his brain damage.

During the first MRI, doctors discovered a tiny piece of metal lodged in the boy’s brain, probably from a medical instrument, although it is uncertain whether it broke off during a procedure at Children’s or a previous procedure at another hospital.

At one point during the MRI, his heart rate plummeted, and doctors had to resuscitate him.

When he left the hospital, he was unable to walk or speak.

Brian Fox said the jury awarded damages of $5 million for his son’s pain and suffering, $5 million for Jason’s parents’ loss of their child, and $5 million for Jason’s wrongful death.

Andrew C. Meyer Jr., a prominent Boston medical malpractice lawyer who represents plaintiffs, said the $15 million was unusually large, given that the alleged malpractice did not lead to years of costly ongoing medical care.

However, the Foxes will not receive $15 million. Dailey said the defendants in the case agreed during jury deliberations to guarantee plaintiffs a minimum amount of damages, regardless of the verdict, in exchange for a cap on possible damages. Dailey declined to specify what the cap was.

Brian Fox’s trial lawyer, James Fox, a cousin who practices in California, would not confirm that such an agreement was reached.

The Board of Registration in Medicine is still investigating Lock and one of the physicians who was found negligent, Dr. Peter Laussen, who directed the cardiac intensive care unit, a board spokesman said yesterday.

The board reopened the investigation last year after learning that the hospital may not have provided complete information about the treatment the doctors gave Jason.

Brian Fox said yesterday that the board initiated an investigation this summer into DiNardo’s actions, as well.

Published on:

Some cases settle relatively quickly, while some take years to settle.  Oftentimes, there is no settlement at all after years of litigation and the case must be decided in court by either a judge or jury.  The bottom line: there is no way to predict how long your case will take to resolve, assuming it even does resolve. 

Here is a great article on why, and how, there are so many delays with personal injury cases, from the National Association of Personal Injury Lawyers wesbite:

"In this article, I will attempt to pin down the inherent causes of the anxiety and impatience some people feel when their personal injury case seems to drag on forever, with no clear resolution in site. Personal injury litigation can sometimes take years, with little hope in sight, at times, of seeing any substantial reward. But that's no reason to lose hope, as with a little perseverence and the law (and a good personal injury lawyer) on your side, justice isn' so far-fetched an idea after all.

Contact Information